SC: I was definitely thinking on something like this it would be regional at most and then it would kind of die down and people would kind of catch on.
AS- This is why I keep telling people…people going, “Well that’s just a utopia,” and it’s like, no…It’s not a utopia. All it is, is a hell of a lot better than what we have now. That’s why I want it to get it going. I just want better. This system is psychopathic wacko-doodle. Why would we keep doing the same thing and expecting different results?
I’ve gotten some flack about my comparison of abundancism to communism because really the purist communism is closer to abundancism. There is two key factors that makes it different. It still sees everything as one pie that we divvy up equally. Verses abundancism that sees it as a buffet that everyone can take as much as they would like from. We’re all cool, it’s not sharing per see. Communism gets into the idea of sharing where as..
SC: Forcible sharing. Sometimes.
AS: Well it becomes that when you start adding the Stalin’s and you know… The people who are still trying to keep it an iconic system with a top down control. What I’m trying to do is put the power at the bottom to move problems up to be solved. And I tell you if some problem hit’s the planetary level and we still can’t solve for it we’re SOL (shit out of luck). I can’t say that all problems will there by be solved, the end. There will be problems that persist. I give it low probability that any problem will reach that level and be deemed unsolvable.
